Restructuring the Legislative Institution to Promote Equitable National Development

AA Lanyalla Mahmud Mattalitti, Suparto Wijoyo, Muhamad Nafik Hadi Ryandono

Abstract

This study examines the institutional design of Indonesia’s representative bodies - the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) and the Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPD RI) - with particular attention to their constitutional status, functions, and competences within Indonesia’s democratic constitutional framework. Using a doctrinal (normative juridical) legal research method, the study analyzes relevant constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, and constitutional doctrines governing Indonesia’s bicameral legislature.
The findings reveal structural and functional deficiencies within Indonesia’s representative system that potentially undermine legislative effectiveness and equitable national development. These deficiencies include the asymmetrical distribution of legislative authority between the two chambers, overlapping competences, and procedural constraints that significantly restrict the DPD RI’s substantive participation in the lawmaking process. Such institutional imbalances weaken the system of checks and balances envisioned in a democratic constitutional state and limit the effectiveness of bicameralism as a mechanism for territorial representation.
In response, this study proposes a strategic restructuring of Indonesia’s representative institutions aimed at strengthening democratic accountability and institutional equilibrium. The proposed reforms consist of two principal measures: (1) permitting independent (non-party-affiliated) candidacy for membership in the DPR RI in order to broaden political inclusion and enhance representational diversity; and (2) establishing functional and authority parity between the DPR RI and the DPD RI to reinforce genuine bicameralism and improve legislative coherence. The study concludes that such reforms are essential to enhancing democratic representation, consolidating checks and balances, and fostering inclusive and sustainable national development in Indonesia.

 

Keywords: Bicameralism; Constitutional Reform; Legislative Institutional Design; Democratic Representation; Checks and Balances; Territorial Representation; National Development; Indonesia.

 

DOI https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.53.2.6


Full Text:

PDF


References


C. Banton, “What Is Path Dependency? Definition, Effects, and Example.” Accessed: Dec. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/path-dependency.asp

Y. Saputra, “Adapun aspek dasar pertimbangan teoritis dibentuknya DPD notabene untuk membangun mekanisme kontrol dan keseimbangan ( check and balances ) antar cabang kekuasaan negara dan antar lembaga legislatif sendiri.,” vol. 26, no. November, pp. 1–10, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.vivajusticia.law.ugm.ac.id/

A. Ilmar, Governance Law. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2014.

P. M. Marzuki, Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

J. Asshiddiqie, Principles of Indonesian Constitutional Law Post-Reformasi. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Popular, 2007.

M. T. Azhary, The State of Law, A Study of Its Principles Seen in the Perspective of Islamic Law, Its Implementation in the Period of the State of Medina and the Present. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992.

J. Asshiddiqie, “The Constitutional Structure of Indonesia After the Fourth Amendment of the 1945 Constitution,” in VIII National Legal Development Seminar, Denpasar: National Legal Development Agency, 2003, p. 2.

A. G. Anshori, Philosophy of History, Tradition and Legal Meaning. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Pres, 2006.

A. Lijpharts, Patterns of Democracies. Yale, USA: Yale University Press, 2012.

M. Salter, Democracy for All? Minority Rights and Minorities’ Participation and Representation in Democratic Politics. Swedia: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2011.

T. H. Handoko, Personnel Management and Human Resources. Yogyakarta: SPFE, 2006.

A. Giddens, The Constitution on Society: Structural Theory for Social Analysis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Siswa, 2011.

F. Jurdi, “The Existence of the Indonesian Parliament After the Constitutional Amendment,” Staatrechts Law J., vol. 2, no. 1, 2016.

S. Hadi, “The Principle of Checks and Balances in the Structure of People’s Representative Institutions in Indonesia (Study of the Proposed Fifth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia),” Mimb. Keadilan, p. 240, 2015.

I. M. Yusuf, “Restructuring and Repositioning of Bureaucracy (As a Solution to Organize Political and Bureaucratic Relations),” J. Soc. Polit. Sci., p. 22, 2021.

H. Nashir, “Understanding Structuralism in the Perspective of Giddens’ Sociology,” J. Reflective Sociol., vol. 7, no. 1, 2012.

S. Soemantri, Composition and Position of the Regional Representative Council, Paper. Jakarta: Secretary General of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia, 2003.

D. Thalib, Indonesian Constitution: Constitutional Perspective. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2009.

S. Zulkarnain, Building Constituent Meetings. Jakarta: YAPPIKA, 2006.

I. G. B. Suryawan, Functions and Authorities of the Regional Representative Council of the Ius Constituendum Perspective, January. Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media, 2020.

A. Mahadiansar, Khairul Ikhsan, I Gede Eko Putra Sri Sentanu, “The Paradigm of National Development Model Development in Indonesia,” J. Adm. Sci., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 80, 2020.

S. L. Rohi, “The Implications of the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution on the National Development Planning System,” Politika, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 88, 2013.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.